Sometimes we need to stop and consider whether the assumption we are making might not be a correct one. In this case, the letter writer outraged about the so-called vandalism to stop signs, seems to think that the “destructive individual” (really?) should be punished to the full extent of the law.
First question: why does she think it’s the work of only one person?
Second question: given the destruction that the Harper Cons have wreaked on the country as a whole, is this really a big thing to get upset about?